Infusing Test Protocols into Classroom Instruction
CES 35, CSD 9; PS24, CSD 15;
DeWitt Clinton High School, the Bronx
|
|
Description of the Practice
Integrating the use of the testing formats and procedures of the E-PAL,
the 4th grade ELA and English Regents examinations into literacy and content
area lessons in both languages.
|
|
Elements of the Practice
The instructional strategy is based on this sequence: 1. Students listen
to or read a selection. 2. Students organize the content of the selection
on a graphic organizer or take notes. 3. Students participate in oral
and written comprehension activities about the selection [The students'
specific comprehension skill and strategy needs are identified from various
assessment data]. 4. Students generate a written response based on a prompt.
The type of written response changes over a period of time to include
reflective, persuasive, summary, chronological, process, biographical,
and literary analysis writing.
|
|
Scaffolding strategies
Teachers use a variety of scaffolding strategies that match students'
communicative competency levels: (1) Written response spirals up from
complete sentences, sets of logical-order sentences, paragraphs and multiple-paragraph
writing. (2) Visuals and descriptions (in both languages, whichever is
appropriate) are provided to establish comprehension. (3) Teachers model
the protocols and use "think aloud" strategies to help students become
familiar with testing protocols.
|
|
Performance Assessment Strategies
Teachers use such performance assessment strategies as primary trait
scoring guides and performance rubrics to collect evidence of student
growth. (The teachers use the same guides and rubrics to establish consistency
of purpose across the grades and proficiency levels.)
In this instructional strategy students are working towards several primary literacy standards:
Reading Habits, Getting the Meaning, Writing Purposes and Resulting Genres,
Language Use and Conventions. They are also moving towards such ELA Standards
as E1c, E2b, E2c, E2e, E2f; E4a and E4b; E5a. This strategy also promotes
important language acquisition skills such as listening with intent and
using metadiscourse strategies, as well as procedural knowledge
|
|
Evidence that the Practice Was Effective
Teachers have documented growth of individual students by saving the
scoring guides used to evaluate the written response selections of each
student in performance portfolios. Informal analysis shows growth. Although
it is too early to see a direct relationship of the use of the strategy
with student performance, teachers have begun to document growth around
student use of such primary traits as: (1) test-taking strategies, (2)
comprehending the main ideas of listen-to and reading selections, (3)
specific writing formats and genres, (4) specific sentence elements, and
(5) conventions of punctuation and spelling in both languages. That is,
there is documentation of individual student growth in specific comprehension,
test-taking and writing competencies.
|
|
Learner and School Contexts
|
|