Alternating Use of L1, L2 with Pre-K Students in
an Inclusion Classroom
PS 29, CSD 7
|
|
Description of the practice
Teachers of Bilingual Education may choose from several models of L1,
L2 language use. These models include the option of separating language
use by subject area, by the person speaking each language, or by time
and place considerations. The operating principle common to all three
options is that the languages are kept separate so that students learn
to function effectively in each language. This does not preclude creating
bridges between the two languages, to be used in a systematic way. It
does preclude mixing the languages randomly. The Pre-K teacher uses the
home language and English as the language of instruction on alternate
days. In this way, she gives students an opportunity to hear, speak and
function in a single language without relying on the other for a translation.
In order to support this choice, she uses a variety of learning strategies,
derived from research:
- Monitoring comprehension by questioning for clarification
- Elaborating of prior knowledge (i.e., grounding new learning in
what's already known)
- Using material resources and concrete references (i.e., symbolic
representations of real objects
|
|
Elements of the practice
The theme of the week under observation is Getting to Know Our Community
Workers. Ms. T., as she is called by her pre-k students, calls her students
to the story rug. She is armed with a Big Book and lots of figures depicting
various community workers. The students get excited by the presence of
so many beautiful and colorful toys. Its takes a few moments to settle
them down. Ms.T. gets them ultimately to focus as she goes over the name
and function of some of the figures. She asks many open-ended questions
and passes the figures around to each child. She complete this process
for four community workers. She dismisses the group to play in several
centers designed to extend their learning: i.e. an art activity, a housekeeping
activity and a talking center where students talked about what they wanted
to be. All the community workers created by the children were displayed
outside the classroom. Thus their effort is rewarded.
|
|
Evidence that the Practice Works
Informal assessment is the hallmark of pre-k education. Students at the
pre-K level are preparing to become readers and nascent writers, and to
do so need to be exposed to many print items as well as encouraged to
develop a varied and rich vocabulary. They need many opportunities to
ask questions, and comment at length on their world. Ms. T. provides this
in at least two ways: she structures both formal and naturalistic opportunities
to speak, listen and use language. She does this over and over in two
languages on an alternate basis. She also does this by consciously packing
in language opportunities, realizing that some children my not have ample
opportunity in their homes to develop the skills necessary to realize
their potential in school settings. The effectiveness of her practices
will be fully measured when the ECLAS is applied.
|
|
Learner and School Contexts
PS 29 has a large and varied Hispanic population. Some are born abroad
and come to the US to be raised here; others are native-born children
of immigrant parents; most are children born in the US of native parents
who in many cases attended PS 29 as children themselves. There is a BE
classroom for every grade level; thus there are six classrooms which make
up the program. The school has recently adopted a transitional BE model,
beginning in pre-K all the way up to the fifth grade. Classrooms are self-contained,
but the district-mandated Literacy Block cuts across grade level classrooms
in order to better serve all students. For example, all the third, fourth
and fifth grade BE students go to classrooms for reading according to
tested levels, not classroom assignments. In addition, BE teachers have
a weekly common prep and are working to better articulate curriculum and
instruction across the grades. Ms.T. is an experienced pre-k teacher who
has recently begun working with Special Education students. She is a co-facilitator
of an inclusion pre-k classroom. She co-teaches with a Special Education
teacher and two teaching assistants.
|
|